Reżyseria:
Steven QualeScenariusz:
John SwetnamZdjęcia:
Brian PearsonMuzyka:
Brian TylerObsada:
Richard Armitage, Sarah Wayne Callies, Matt Walsh, Max Deacon, Nathan Kress, Alycia Debnam-Carey, Arlen Escarpeta, Jeremy Sumpter, Lee Whittaker (więcej)VOD (4)
Opisy(1)
W ciągu jednego dnia Silverton zostaje spustoszone przez niespotykaną do tej pory serię tornad. Całe miasteczko pozostaje na łasce i niełasce nieobliczalnych i śmiercionośnych cyklonów, a łowcy tornad przewidują, że najgorsze dopiero przed nimi. Większość mieszkańców szuka schronienia, lecz niektórzy ruszają w kierunku oka cyklonu. Chcą sprawdzić, jak daleko może posunąć się łowca burz, by zrobić zdjęcie swojego życia. Film Into the Storm widziany oczyma zawodowych łowców burz, żądnych wrażeń amatorów i odważnych mieszkańców miasta pozwala widzom znaleźć się w samym centrum wydarzeń i przekonać się o niszczycielskiej sile przyrody, utrwalonej w obiektywie ich aparatów. (Warner Bros. PL)
(więcej)Materiały wideo (3)
Recenzje (7)
A textbook example of poor film direction. Though the movie is visually captivating, the casting and dialogue are simply bad. It’s as if it was filmed by the second crew, which normally works only on the supporting technical scenes without any acting and doesn’t care the slightest bit about the dramaturgy of the story (the last Transformers suffered from the same failing).
()
It looks and sounds really great, but the tons of messy situations, seen so many times elsewhere and still so serious, are really catastrophic. And even the idea of shooting the whole film with handheld and public cameras couldn't make it any more interesting, because it almost seems that everyone in this town has a camera (maybe only the dog didn't film) and everyone wants to be a documentary filmmaker, which takes away all the "authenticity". As hilarious as the special effects tornadoes are and the scenes of their rampage are interesting, Into the Storm is mostly boring and I'll have to watch Twister again sometime. Two and a half.
()
A TV movie with a really high budget. About four or five scenes are really worth watching (mainly the fire and Mack’s flypast the airport), and so such a high rating, but the rest is just stuffing. Dumb dialogs, “random shots", illogical nonsense. And poor Richard Armitage cast in a role totally beyond the abilities of heartless tough guys.
()
I am not a tornado expert and I’ve never even seen a tornado. Nevertheless, I cannot imagine that a monster such as the one that appeared in this movie could appear in America. On the other hand, I bow down before the creators, because they did a great job connecting handheld camera with a proper filmmaking. I could hardly believe how many great shots this movie had. At times where a low-budget movie would be shaky, in this movie the cameraman clearly got some robot helper who did the job for him, or they fed him more, because the camera is stable even during the biggest hurricane and offers a view only mother nature can create. I have to say, I was really surprised. I’ve always been fascinated by tornados and this movie is not any exception. Just the classic American moralizing at the end was a bit unnecessary.
()
If it were more ambitious, I'd be jumping for joy. I missed the US government, the meteorologists and all the people trying to solve this issue globally here, it unfortunately focuses on only a handful of characters, which bothered me. The effects are great, but the film also moves slowly and before I know it the film is over. 60%
()
Galeria (51)
Photo © Warner Bros. Pictures
![Epicentrum - Z filmu](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/158/582/158582347_158b5a.jpg)
Reklama