Reżyseria:
David FincherScenariusz:
Jim UhlsZdjęcia:
Jeff CronenwethMuzyka:
The Dust BrothersObsada:
Edward Norton, Brad Pitt, Helena Bonham Carter, Meat Loaf, Jared Leto, Zach Grenier, Holt McCallany, Eion Bailey, Richmond Arquette, David Andrews (więcej)VOD (5)
Opisy(1)
Jack (Edward Norton) cierpi na chroniczną bezsenność i jest całkowicie znudzony swym dotychczasowym życiem. Do czasu, gdy spotyka charyzmatycznego Tylera Durdena (Brad Pitt) - sprzedawcę mydła o dość pokrętnej filozofii życia... Uważa on bowiem, że samo-doskonalenie jest dla słabeuszy, a to co rzeczywiście sprawia, że warto żyć to samo-destrukcja. Kiedy mieszkanie Jacka zostaje kompletnie zniszczone w wyniku tajemniczego wybuchu, Tyler oferuje mu gościnę. Spotykają się w barze, piją na umór i wszczynają bójkę na gołe pięści, która nieoczekiwanie przynosi im ogromną satysfakcję. Wkrótce cotygodniowe walki stają się celem ich życia i przyciągają coraz to nowych zwolenników. Zainicjowany przez nich Podziemny krąg obejmuje swym brutalnym zasięgiem cały kraj i odnosi oszałamiający sukces. Jednak już niedługo Jacka spotka szokująca niespodzianka, za sprawą której zmieni się wszystko... (Imperial Cinepix)
(więcej)Materiały wideo (3)
Recenzje (11)
At the age of eighteen, when I was angry at the system and I liked the Doors (the band) and Pulp Fiction, Fight Club would have been the movie of my life. But today, I don’t think I could be a movie star even if I really wanted to and did everything necessary to achieve that. And I've learned to get by in the system. Which is sufficient reason for me to think of this movie as just very spectacularly filmed bullshit.
()
The genius directing by David Fincher plays the main role in Fight Club, being able to keep up with the anarchically crazy literary manifestation by Palahniuk against the current lifestyle of western society. Someone else who contributed a lot toward the excellent result was Jim Uhls, who adapted the book into a screenplay that could be used to make a movie. Unarguably, the book is a stronger experience, but the movie also has much to offer, thanks to the actors, the technical side and, primarily, Fincher’s playfulness. On the other hand, the original book isn’t one of the best things ever to have trickled out of Palahniuk’s sick mind.
()
The most indigestible, but intellectually and thematically the most charged and, perhaps for some, the most compelling David Fincher film. And after mature consideration, also my favorite. Anarchy, fights, and at times hopeless situations, depression, and despair. But above all, the life in it! The living energy of all the characters at any time of the day, night, or person.
()
This is the richest interpretive film I know. Is it a critique of consumerism, a satire on the far-right and anarchist associations at the same time, or just a provocative thriller about the need for violence? Maybe all of it. In any case, it takes a good bit of genius to make it not look, through its shiny facade, like an angry young generation that wants to save the world with rocks in their hands, but rather like a serious ancient philosopher who has it all figured out to the last detail. It was a breakthrough life film for when I was in my 20s, and a decade later it’s (only) a fantastic cinematic ride without compromises, reflecting the end of the 1990s like few other things.
()
An undisguised anarchist tinge of unapologetic shitting on the system? A satire on the emergence of terrorist groups seemingly based on good intentions? The hidden desires of a young man who wants to be something he can't be? Maybe none of it and maybe all of it together? In this case, I don’t care. The fact is that this is a brilliant piece of filmmaking with lots of great moments and food for thought. Fincher kicks ass.
()
Reklama