Reżyseria:
Oliver HirschbiegelScenariusz:
Bernd EichingerZdjęcia:
Rainer KlausmannMuzyka:
Stephan ZachariasObsada:
Bruno Ganz, Alexandra Maria Lara, Corinna Harfouch, Ulrich Matthes, Juliane Köhler, Heino Ferch, Christian Berkel, Matthias Habich, Thomas Kretschmann (więcej)Opisy(1)
Berlin, kwiecień 1945 roku. Na ulicach panuje chaos nie do opisania. Naród niemiecki czeka na swą nieuchronną klęskę. Adolf Hitler wraz ze swoimi najbliższymi współpracownikami ukrywa się w bunkrze w podziemiach Kancelarii Rzeszy. Wśród "świty" wodza znajduje się Traudl Junge, ostatnia sekretarka Hitlera. To jej wspomnienia posłużyły do przedstawienia ostatnich, spędzonych w izolacji, dwunastu dni życia wodza upadającej III Rzeszy. Te dramatyczne dni wzbudzają tak wiele kontrowersji i domysłów jak żaden inny etap biografii Hitlera. Co naprawdę wydarzyło się 10 metrów pod ulicami Berlina? (Monolith)
(więcej)Recenzje (11)
The star of the film "The Fall of the Third Reich" is Adolf Hitler. No, maybe I should correct myself a little. The star is Bruno Ganz, who portrayed the German dictator in an absolutely incredible way, a person who was not afraid to kill millions of people just because they had a different origin than what he desired. True, his ideology was a bit more complicated, but we don't have to go into that. "The Fall of the Third Reich" is about how Hitler's life is coming to an end as the war in Europe is also coming to an end. The Soviets have reached Berlin and the city is being destroyed. The constant background of the whole film is explosions and gunfire. Hitler is still trying to do something to change the situation, he wants to reverse the course of events in his bunker, but gradually realizes that it is no longer possible. The last moments of this mad man are well-known, but when I watched what he actually did, when I could see him portrayed by the excellent Ganz, I realized that Hitler must have had enough sanity to realize that suicide is the only solution to leave this world peacefully and spare himself the inevitable trials that would follow. Eva Braun, his mistress and wife in the final stages of his life, is depicted as a completely fanatic woman who is willing to do anything for her Leader. But she was not alone. The film definitely does not aim to only condemn the Germans, I think that rather than an attack on the nation, it is a demonstration of what a person can achieve when they have sufficient abilities and acquire the necessary power. People are willing to go along with him under any conditions and take any steps, just to avoid being on the other side of the barricade. It is insane, but one single person can control the masses. Even if the masses know that he is insane, they will stand behind him as long as they feel that the other side is worse and that there is a bright future waiting on this - for now, right - side. Or at least the vision of it. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/10/ong-bak-pad-treti-rise-bolt-zathura-3g.html
()
I have never experienced such a quiet audience during the closing credits in a multiplex. Downfall is a modest masterpiece, powerful mainly due to the content that it reconstructs and by the gravity of the events that it depicts. In terms of imagery, it is a theatrically austere interior affair relying on the most realistic possible design of the sets and on the performances of the actors, who are exceptional. Not only Bruno Ganz, but also the other protagonists display maximum commitment to their work. The well-cast faces of Joseph and Magda Goebbels, whose cold-bloodedness and unhealthy devotion to the Führer almost surpass the terrible expression of Hitler’s demonic personality. Goebbels’s cold-eyed expression will haunt me for quite some time. Among other things, the film provokes the thought of what the world might look like if Hitler had succeeded in his plan. The scene in which he makes a visionary speech as he walks alongside a mock-up of the center of the Third Reich’s capital is one of the film’s best.
()
For a person who is not interested in history and confuses Husák with Hitler, it is certainly a meritorious and interesting piece of work, but for someone with an interest in history, it is a modest account that does not bring any fundamental new information and not even the controversial view of one human being that is so much proclaimed in the press. In any case, the performances were excellent, including Bruno Ganz, whose role was tempting to overact, which fortunately did not happen. Overall, I would see it as a three and a half stars, rounded down this time due to the high expectations.
()
The only negative of the film Downfall is its formal aspects. This is not a key and fatal negative, as some "I always have to write something different than the others" reviewers try to prove in their analyses. The director and screenwriters chose as the main narrative perspective "documentary distance" from the story and, adversely, a very expressive approach to the atmosphere. As a result, the dialogues have a austere and non-stylish feel, while the suffocating atmosphere of the bunker is abundantly and impressively complemented by sound effects (silence vs. rumbling), a camera (which sticks to the characters and promotes a claustrophobic and hopeless feeling) and editing (combining the illusion of interiors with naturalism in exteriors). While the expressive component of the film works perfectly, the documentary aspects tend to slip into excessive semi-pathos, multi-wording, and boringly branched dialogues, which, with a certain repetitiveness, take away momentum from the film. Not fatally, of course. The introduction of a "secondary" narrator in the form of Traudl Jung also proved very useful, who mediates a civilian view of the icons of the Third Reich - a civilian view which, in its naivety and blindness, is perhaps the most tragic feature of the film. And Jung's documentary suffix only points him out in all his nudity "...I should have been more interested..." A chilling finish of one of the storylines. But "Downfall" has more storylines, and it must be admitted that director Oliver Hirschbiegel was able to portray them all with certainty and persuasiveness. The result is a film with a raw atmosphere, teasing with questions (which the viewer has to answer for himself), and it is oppressive in that it does not hide anything with the poor decoys of heroic pathos. German cinema successfully passed the state exam in post-war adulthood...
()
A movie that seems more like a documentary that isn’t so much about Hitler’s last days, as about the people around him and his last atrocity committed on his own nation. Certainly worth watching, but if it hadn’t been made by Germans, it would never have caused such a stir (is it really making Hitler seem more human if he thanks his cook for his food?). Even so, it’s good that it was the Germans who filmed it; they need to chase the skeletons out of their closet.
()
The roaring protagonist Bruno Ganz might look like Hitler, but that's not enough to make this a good movie. After the first half hour, all the dramatic unrest or sadness of the supporting characters starts playing itself out, and the final catharsis doesn't have time to fix anything. In the end, the war film crystallizes into a dramatic journey through the history of Germany, accompanied by confused editing and the feel of a (non)eventful film that only generated buzz from a thematic standpoint.
()
This is the precisely and generously filmed agony of a deteriorating political system and the once proud and invincible army of Nazi Germany. It is probably the most impressive German film about their perspective on participation in World War II. Except for details such as personal dialogues between characters, it is based on historical facts. Hour after hour, we can observe the relentless tightening noose of encirclement around Berlin, the declining mood of the bunker occupants beneath the Reichstag building, until it reaches freezing point, exposing human characters and the self-proclaimed elite, who wanted to rule the world, and who must now hold themselves accountable. It is an excellent study of human characters in a critical situation, evading responsibility in a live broadcast. Bruno Ganz deserves the highest recognition for his portrayal of the German dictator. Overall impression: 95%.
()
Even years later, Downfall is a truly powerful experience. The famous producer Bernd Eichinger cleverly drew on the book "Der Untergang" by Joachim Fest and the memoirs of Hitler's youngest secretary Traudl Junge, published under the title "Until the Final Hour: Hitler's Last Secretary." After all, Junge's confession frames the whole story of the last days of the Third Reich. And although she did not live to see the premiere of the film, her memories of her years at the Führer's side were the subject of a separate documentary Blind Spot. Hitler's Secretary. Thanks to this material, the resulting film is a much deeper and more plastic account of the end of a millennial empire that lasted only 12 years and yet never ceases to fascinate and is important to study in every detail. We follow so many important questions and paradoxes scene by scene, meeting once again those infamous figures of history. The cast is very interesting, for example Eva Braun - she was 33 at the time of her death, but played by almost 40-year-old Juliane Köhler (known from Aimee & Jaguar). And despite this handicap, she became a very authentic Mrs. Hitler. Magda Goebbels is a slightly different case - she was 44 at the time of her death, her character is 6 years older than Corinna Harfouch (famous as Vera Brühne), and her actions spoke for her more than her acting. Bruno Ganz (one of the best Hitlers) and Alexandra Maria Lara (Traudl Junge) are practically ideal representatives.
()
The first war film dealing with the conflict from the other side, and also directed by “natives”. There is a certain interest in the material, but it doesn't have any significant impact on the viewer. The script is simple and the actors (although very decent) practically have nothing to rely on. Bruno Ganz stands out, but mainly because seeing Hitler himself on the screen is already a peculiar and unique experience. But Oliver Hirschbiegel didn't excel in terms of visual presentation. The cold visual style doesn't stand out as it should, and the war scenes are quite implausible and poorly edited.
()
Downfall is a prime example of a quality historical film that mixes authentic events, perfect acting and great technical workmanship. It tells the story of a man who can be a caring husband and affable employer on the one hand, but also a monster without a drop of compassion on the other. We are, of course, talking about Adolf Hitler, who has made an indelible mark on history as a cruel dictator who wanted to conquer the entire world, in which only the 'pure' Aryan race would live. In this film we get a glimpse of the few days that preceded Hitler's death and the fall of the Reich. It captures, in particular the emotions of everyone involved, from the secretary, to the commanders, generals and chancellors, to the Führer himself. World War II is a timeless subject that has an inexhaustible supply, and this film depicts just one of its most poignant moments, and it doesn't even take place on the battlefield. Bruno Ganz is perfect as Hitler, and the cast of the Goebbels couple along with Traudl Junge are as well. In short, a film that really managed to blow me away despite its running time - I wasn't even breathing at the final recap of the fates.
()
Exhausting, authentic, daring, brilliantly acted and directed, decadent, one hell of a film.
()
Reklama